Cornwall Alliance

For the Stewardship of Creation

  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • What Drives Us
    • Our History in Highlights
    • Cornwall Alliance Statement of Faith
    • Donate
  • Landmark Documents
    • A Call to Protect the Unborn and the Pro-Life Movement from Environmentalist Deceit: A Declaration by Concerned Pro-Lifers
    • Petition: Forget ‘Climate Change’, Energy Empowers the Poor!
    • Protect the Poor: Ten Reasons to Oppose Harmful Climate Change Policies
    • A Call to Truth, Prudence, and Protection of the Poor 2014: The Case against Harmful Climate Policies Gets Stronger
    • An Open Letter on Climate Change to the People, their Local Representatives, the State Legislatures and Governors, the Congress, and the President of the United States of America
    • The Biblical Perspective of Environmental Stewardship: Subduing and Ruling the Earth to the Glory of God and the Benefit of Our Neighbors
    • The Cornwall Declaration On Environmental Stewardship
    • The Cornwall Stewardship Agenda
    • A Renewed Call to Truth, Prudence, and Protection of the Poor
    • Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming
    • Foundational Principles of Biblical Earth Stewardship
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Request A Speaker
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Request a Talk Show Guest
    • Request Opinion Columns
  • Shop
    • Books
    • DVDs
  • Contact
  • Donate
Home / Bridging Humanity and the Environment / What Happens to Professors who Dare Question Climate Orthodoxy?

What Happens to Professors who Dare Question Climate Orthodoxy?

by E. Calvin Beisner

May 24, 2018

Peter Ridd

Well, sometimes they’re told to shut up. And if they don’t, sometimes they get fired. And after that, sometimes they get told to shut up about being fired.

That’s the gist of what’s happened to Dr. Peter Ridd, ex-professor of marine science at James Cook University in Australia. Ridd had the temerity to point out, in a chapter for the book Climate Change: The Facts 2017, that studies on which the claim that rising atmospheric CO2 concentration—blamed also for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming—was to blame for declining rates of calcification in the Great Barrier Reef were fatally flawed.

“Coral reefs are dying because you drive an SUV or switch on your electric lights!” That’s the idea.

What Ridd pointed out was that the studies fallaciously mixed two datasets, one from a very large and very old batch of coral and the other from some very small and very young corals, the two sorts with predictably significant differences in growth patterns, into a single new set that gave the impression that calcification (essentially, growth) rates had been steady for a very long time and then had suddenly fallen off a cliff. (Call it the inverted hockey stick.)

What did his employer, James Cook University, do? Well, what any defender of science would do: It congratulated Ridd and gave him a promotion for doing what every good scientist, believing in the motto of the Royal Society (nullius in verba, “on the word of no one”), should do: test claims.

Except no.  Instead, JCU accused him of not being collegial and, when he refused to shut up, fired him. In short, it decided to get rid of Ridd.

Jennifer Marohasy gives the details of this sordid attempt to silence a good scholar.

Climate alarmism at work, always championing academic freedom and freedom of speech!

Update, April 23, 2019

Peter Ridd sued James Cook University, and the court ruled in his favor on every count. See here for details.

Dated: May 24, 2018

Tagged With: Climate Change the Facts 2017, climate consensus, CO2 and coral reefs, Great Barrier Reef, James Cook University, Jennifer Marohasy, Peter Ridd
Filed Under: Bridging Humanity and the Environment, Climate Consensus

About E. Calvin Beisner

Dr. Beisner is Founder and National Spokesman of The Cornwall Alliance; former Associate Professor of Historical Theology & Social Ethics, at Knox Theological Seminary, and of Interdisciplinary Studies, at Covenant College; and author of “Where Garden Meets Wilderness: Evangelical Entry into the Environmental Debate” and “Prospects for Growth: A Biblical View of Population, Resources, and the Future.”

Comments

  1. Francisco Machado says

    May 26, 2018 at 3:39 pm

    AGW is a proselytizing religion, totalitarian in its cohesion to dogma. Refutation is anathema. Non believers and apostates will be demonized, sanctions will be brought to bear upon them until they recant and even then they will be subject to intrusive observation. The Progressives will refer the issue to the Ministry of Truth. MiniLuv will be visited upon them – for their own good, of course.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent Stewards Blog Posts

  • Climate Lockdowns, CO2 Social Credits, Carbon Footprint Tracking by Credit Card—Big Brother Is Growing!
  • A Simple Explanation of Why Climate Models “Run Hot”
  • Countdown to COP26 on the road to failure
  • Get Involved: Educate Your Community!
  • Is Religious Environmentalism an Evidence-Free Zone? Is Christianity?

Are Science & Religion in Conflict?



Copyright © 2021 · Cornwall Alliance · 3712 Ringgold Rd #355, Chattanooga, TN 37412 · Phone: (423) 500-3009

Designed by Ingenious Geeks & John A. Peck · Log in