Scientist and economist Dr. Alan Carlin was a model civil servant for nearly forty years, serving as a science analyst in the federal Environmental Protection Agency. But in 2009, he made a bad career move. He told the truth. As one of the EPA staff members assigned to assess the warming effect of added CO2 […]
Bringing a Little Sanity to the Environmental Protection Agency Learn More »
Ivar Giaever explains in this video lecture why he rejects global warming alarming. “It’s ridiculous,” he says, to think we can measure global average temperature (GAT) accurately, and that we should consider an increase in GAT from ~1880 to 2015 from ~288 degrees Kelvin to ~288.8 degrees Kelvin (an increase of only 0.3%) frightening. There’s
“Global warming really has become a new religion”–Nobel Physicist Ivar Giaever Learn More »
Indur Goklany is one of my favorite scholars on the interplay of people, resources, and our natural environment. Few are more thorough and careful to root their ideas in solid empirical research. And what his research reveals, again and again, is that people’s creativity is making the world a better and better place to live,
How Fossil Fuels Benefit People and the Planet Learn More »
Environmentalists, including the advisors responsible for the content of Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’, and even many of their critics, routinely refer to a “balance of nature,” a concept that elicits visions of fragile nature knocked off balance by crossing “tipping points” that lead to catastrophes–concepts fundamental to global warming alarmism. Veteran ecologist Daniel Botkin finds
Is There a “Balance of Nature”? Learn More »
At +0.11C per decade rate, Global Average Temperature would rise 1.1C in a century, not the ~3C generally predicted by IPCC without CO2 emission reduction. Actual increase in the 36.5 years since 1978 is 0.407C. To wind up with 3C increase in the century from 1978 through 2077, we’d need to add another 2.593C in
Steven W. Mosher expresses dismay at Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’ not because it embraces fears of dangerous manmade global warming (though he points out those baseless fears in it, too) but because many of its ecological claims are just plain wrong. “Having read through Pope Francis’ new encyclical, I am dismayed at how many groundless assertions
What Planet Does Pope Francis Live On? Learn More »
Paul Etienne, Catholic Bishop of Cheyenne, with jurisdiction over the Diocese of Wyoming, was cited recently in Inside Energy as calling Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’ “a call to action” for Wyoming, the nation’s largest coal-producing state. But there might not be quite so much to what Bishop Etienne said as Inside Energy would wish. The sole quote
Bishop’s “Call to Action” on Climate and Fossil Fuels May Be Less than Meets the Eye Learn More »
Rud Istvan has a very instructive article at Judith Curry’s Climate Etc. blog about the challenges of bring wind and solar power into use through electricity grids. Bottom line: Their intermittency greatly increases the costs of electricity while reducing its reliability, bringing threats to people’s health and safety wherever they begin to make up a significant
While attention worldwide focuses on manmade global warming, the risks from which are fairly small compared to the benefits of the energy use that allegedly drives it, the real risk to humanity (and the rest of the biosphere) is, as it has been throughout geologic history, from nature-made global cooling. Atmospheric physicist S. Fred Singer
Ice Ages: Our Real Climate Catastrophe Learn More »
Monday, July 1, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violated the law by imposing regulations on mercury emissions from power plants without first doing thorough benefit/cost estimates. Nearly four years ago the Cornwall Alliance published a study by environmental regulatory economics Dr. Timothy Terrell, The Cost of Good Intentions:
Supreme Court Vindicates Cornwall Alliance on Mercury Emissions Learn More »
