World Magazine Exposes Evangelical Environmentalists’ Growing Dependence on Green-Left Funding

Many environmentalists are fond of accusing all critics of their alarms of being in the pocket of industry. World magazine has just turned the tables. In a three-page article, World environment reporter Daniel James Devine reports that evangelical “creation care” organizations like the Evangelical Environmental Network (EEN), its daughter organization Young Evangelicals for Climate Action (YECA), and […]

World Magazine Exposes Evangelical Environmentalists’ Growing Dependence on Green-Left Funding Learn More »

Defense of Climate Models Fails–Just as the Models Do

Critics of CAGW alarmism have for several years had fun pointing out the large and growing discrepancy between computer climate model simulations of global average temperature and real-world observations, with this graph being one of our favorite exhibits: Now Alex Sen Gupta, Senior Lecturer, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences at UNSW Australia, has come

Defense of Climate Models Fails–Just as the Models Do Learn More »

Why One Conservative, Evangelical Republican’s Case for Climate Alarm Fails—Part 2

Yesterday I began a multi-part critique of a recent blog post by Evangelical Environmental Network board chairman Scott Rodin titled “As a Conservative, Evangelical Republican, Why Climate Change Can’t Be True (Even Though It Is).” In that piece I pointed out that scientific data point the opposite direction from where Rodin thinks they do. I also

Why One Conservative, Evangelical Republican’s Case for Climate Alarm Fails—Part 2 Learn More »

New Observational Evidence Supports Old “Infrared Iris” Theory

About seven years ago I read a fascinating paper by Roy Spencer et al. that argued that clouds respond to Earth’s surface temperatures in ways that moderate them–cooling the surface in response to warming, warming it in response to cooling. It led me to an earlier paper by Richard Lindzen that argued that, at least in

New Observational Evidence Supports Old “Infrared Iris” Theory Learn More »

Obviously this Guy’s a Science Denier!

Was it a critic of the IPCC’s notion of dangerous manmade climate change who wrote this? The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for

Obviously this Guy’s a Science Denier! Learn More »

Why One Conservative, Evangelical Republican’s Case for Climate Alarm Fails—Part 1

Dr. Scott Rodin, chairman of the board of the Evangelical Environmental Network and a blogger at The Steward’s Journey, posted a piece May 19, 2015, titled, “As a Conservative, Evangelical Republican, Why Climate Change Can’t be True (Even Though It Is).” It has some very interesting reasoning and deserves careful consideration. In this and several

Why One Conservative, Evangelical Republican’s Case for Climate Alarm Fails—Part 1 Learn More »

Alabama meteorologist James Spann hits the nail on the head

In responding to news hype about the flooding in Houston (the tragedies of which we most certainly don’t want to downplay), James Spann, chief meteorologist for ABC 33/40 in Birmingham, Alabama, hit the nail on the head when he wrote, … the entire climate change situation has become politicized, which I hate. Those on the

Alabama meteorologist James Spann hits the nail on the head Learn More »

Science Daily Mutes Main Point of Important New Study

Nature, one of the world’s premier science journals, has just published a new study showing that “proves that ocean circulation is the link between weather and decadal scale climatic change.” More important, it undermines the storyline of dangerous anthropogenic global warming so hotly promoted by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.S. Environmental

Science Daily Mutes Main Point of Important New Study Learn More »

Words Matter—and So Does Honesty

Some folks just don’t play fair. Instance? Media Matters and ForecasttheFacts.org have just teamed up to pressure the media to not to characterize scientists who doubt claims of dangerous manmade global warming as “skeptics.” Their preferred term? “Deniers.” Why? Two reasons: First, because skepticism is a scientific virtue, which they don’t want to attribute to

Words Matter—and So Does Honesty Learn More »