More Evidence that Deep-State EPA Bureaucrats Aren’t Giving Up

Just in case you wondered whether deep-state bureaucrats at the federal Environmental Protection Agency had finally been brought under control, accountable to the people through their elected President and the EPA Administrator he appoints and the Senate that confirms the appointment, the answer is “No.” Cause of Action Institute announced yesterday that it has discovered

More Evidence that Deep-State EPA Bureaucrats Aren’t Giving Up Learn More »

Shame on Scientific American and E&E News for Lying about John Christy

Scientific American, apparently following the lead of E&E News, headlined its report of Dr. John Christy’s appointment to the federal Environmental Protection Agency “Scientist Who Rejects Warming Is Named to EPA Advisory Board.” The truth—which E&E News and SA undoubtedly know, is that John Christy most certainly doesn’t “reject warming.” He manages the NASA satellite data that are our

Shame on Scientific American and E&E News for Lying about John Christy Learn More »

What Happens to Professors who Dare Question Climate Orthodoxy?

Well, sometimes they’re told to shut up. And if they don’t, sometimes they get fired. And after that, sometimes they get told to shut up about being fired. That’s the gist of what’s happened to Dr. Peter Ridd, ex-professor of marine science at James Cook University in Australia. Ridd had the temerity to point out,

What Happens to Professors who Dare Question Climate Orthodoxy? Learn More »

What’s a “Climate Skeptic”?

In his recent article “Four Reasons Alarmists Are Wrong on Climate Change,” Cornwall Alliance Research Associate for Developing Countries Vijay Jayaraj distinguished what, following widespread usage, he called climate-change alarmists, deniers, and skeptics. The “alarmists” generally think that human emissions of carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) are driving global warming so rapid and eventually

What’s a “Climate Skeptic”? Learn More »