Why “Follow the Money” Doesn’t Cut It

Dr. David Kreutzer, an economist formerly with the Heritage Foundation and now with the Institute for Energy Research, was Cornwall Alliance’s livestream guest July 27 to discuss why President Joe Biden’s “Net Zero by 2050” plan not only won’t succeed but can’t. (You can watch it on Facebook or YouTube.) When I announced this on […]

Why “Follow the Money” Doesn’t Cut It Learn More »

“Net Zero by 2050”: Roadmap to Conflict and Poverty

The Biden Administration wants America to make emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases amount to “net zero”—that is, for emissions and removal of GHGs to be equal—by 2050. The Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA, established in 1974 under the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development following the 1973 oil crisis to ensure that

“Net Zero by 2050”: Roadmap to Conflict and Poverty Learn More »

Obama official concedes it’s impossible to predict the risks of climate change

But media, politicians, and scientists skew climate data A review of Steven E. Koonin’s Unsettled? What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters Mark Twain has supposedly quipped that: “What gets us into trouble is not what we don’t know.  It’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so.”  Challenging what

Obama official concedes it’s impossible to predict the risks of climate change Learn More »

Beyond Industries: Why Half a Billion Other Indians Need Fossil Fuels

India’s population is nearing 1.4 billion and plays an important role in the global economy. Industry, employing about three-fifths of the Indian workforce, and agriculture, employing the other two-fifths, are the twin engines of India’s soaring economy. Both sectors depend on fossil fuels, and the demand for fossil fuels in India is unlikely to diminish

Beyond Industries: Why Half a Billion Other Indians Need Fossil Fuels Learn More »

Why “Green Energy” Isn’t “Clean Energy”—or a Good Substitute for Fossil Fuels

Remember President Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”? It aimed to reduce global warming (aka climate change) by cutting American emissions of carbon dioxide from electricity generation. It never got very far, and the Trump Administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) killed it. But now President Biden has his own version. He announced his “Energy Efficiency and Clean

Why “Green Energy” Isn’t “Clean Energy”—or a Good Substitute for Fossil Fuels Learn More »

Pennsylvania Republican Senators Take a Stand for Constitutional Order Against Green Agenda

Twenty-eight Republican members of the Pennsylvania senate signed a letter April 21 of which Benjamin Franklin would be proud. Protesting Governor Tom Wolf’s frequent use of executive orders to bypass the state legislature, which Republicans dominate, and impose his climate-change agenda on an otherwise unwilling state, hey gave him an ultimatum: Stop it, or we’ll

Pennsylvania Republican Senators Take a Stand for Constitutional Order Against Green Agenda Learn More »

California Governor and Mayor of Los Angeles make a great homeless team

Governor Newsom’s dysfunctional energy policies help the state achieve some of the highest costs for electricity and fuel, perpetuating energy poverty, and Mayor Garcetti spends billions solving the homeless problem. California Governor Gavin Newsom’s dysfunctional energy policies have led to the more expensive electricity and fuels in the state and laid bare the realities of

California Governor and Mayor of Los Angeles make a great homeless team Learn More »

China’s strange endorsement of ‘net zero’

The Chinese path to supposed decarbonization starts with a lot more coal You have to hand it to Xi Jinping. The Chinese “president for life” schmoozed United Nations royalty last September with his unexpected pledge that his country aims “to have CO2 emissions peak before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality (Net Zero) before 2060.” Xi

China’s strange endorsement of ‘net zero’ Learn More »

Indiana Economists Endorse “Carbon Tax”—But Should They?

Recently fifty Indiana economists issued a public letter to their state’s legislature endorsing a “carbon tax” as an economically wise way to curb global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The fundamental premise of taxing CO2 emissions is that they cause more harm than good (and thus are what economists call a “negative externality”—a cost

Indiana Economists Endorse “Carbon Tax”—But Should They? Learn More »