Lying with Statistics About American Electric Energy Sources

Back in 1954 journalist Darrell Huff published How to Lie with Statistics. The book exposed many different ways in which people use statistics, even true ones, to foist off falsehoods. Today while looking for data on trends in the numbers of operating coal- and natural gas-fired power plants in the United States I came across

Lying with Statistics About American Electric Energy Sources Learn More »

The SEC’s Climate-Disclosure Rules Violate the First Amendment

This article summarizes the argument of the author’s more technical article, “What’s ‘Controversial’ About ESG? A Theory of Compelled Commercial Speech under the First Amendment.” The SEC is on the cusp of enacting rules to compel companies to disclose “climate risk.” Commentators have critiqued the rules as misguided and beyond the SEC’s statutory authority. But the proposed

The SEC’s Climate-Disclosure Rules Violate the First Amendment Learn More »

Biden’s Gas Tax Suspension: Meager Help and Deficit Spending

Today President Joe Biden called on Congress to pass legislation suspending the federal tax on gasoline for July through September, “to give Americans a little extra breathing room as they deal with the effects of Putin’s war in Ukraine.” Not Much Savings Put the emphasis on “little.” The average driver drives 1,125 miles per month,

Biden’s Gas Tax Suspension: Meager Help and Deficit Spending Learn More »

India’s Coal Proliferation Contradicts Global Climate Drama

We have a crisis in India, and it is not with the climate. Power plants for the world’s second-largest consumer of coal are running out of stock, leaving a billion people at the risk of blackouts and forcing industries to close facilities. To resolve the situation, the Indian government has authorized increased importation of thermal coal, removed

India’s Coal Proliferation Contradicts Global Climate Drama Learn More »

States’ Opposition to Federal Social Cost of Carbon Use Survives Supreme Court Decision

For years the federal government, especially its Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has sought to use “social cost of carbon” (SCC) as justification, at the cost of billions of dollars, for regulations making it more difficult to drill for and use fossil fuels. That practice can continue—for now. On May 26, the Supreme Court declined a

States’ Opposition to Federal Social Cost of Carbon Use Survives Supreme Court Decision Learn More »