What’s a “Climate Skeptic”?

In his recent article “Four Reasons Alarmists Are Wrong on Climate Change,” Cornwall Alliance Research Associate for Developing Countries Vijay Jayaraj distinguished what, following widespread usage, he called climate-change alarmists, deniers, and skeptics. The “alarmists” generally think that human emissions of carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) are driving global warming so rapid and eventually […]

What’s a “Climate Skeptic”? Learn More »

A Warming Solution that Just Might Work—But Not as Planned?

Los Angeles has a new solution to climate change: painting streets white. Well, not quite a solution to climate change. What it really addresses is what’s called the “urban heat island” (UHI) effect. Cities and towns, with lots of blacktop streets, absorb more energy from sunlight than rural areas, so their ambient air temperatures (especially

A Warming Solution that Just Might Work—But Not as Planned? Learn More »

Who Are the Real Science Deniers? It’s a Given

A little etymology lesson: data derives from the Latin, dare (pronounced DAH-ray), “to give,” and means “given.” (Back when I took Latin, it was typically the second verb the conjugation of which one learned. The first was amo, “I love,” the infinitive form of which is amare.) Data means “given.” In the natural sciences, it’s supposed to mean what

Who Are the Real Science Deniers? It’s a Given Learn More »

#SanFranciscoKnew—What Did San Francisco Know about Climate Change, and When Did It Know It?

David Johnson, who follows us on Facebook, brought our attention to this article, which demonstrates that some California cities, including San Francisco, which with Oakland is suing five major oil companies including ExxonMobil, alleging that the companies suppressed from their stockholders what they knew about the risks of climate change to their stocks’ future value,

#SanFranciscoKnew—What Did San Francisco Know about Climate Change, and When Did It Know It? Learn More »

The elementary error of physics that caused the global warming scare

[Editor’s note: Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, a British journalist and polymath who has been at the forefront of arguments against catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, prepared this document for submission as a brief to U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a case brought by San Francisco and Oakland against five major oil companies that seeks

The elementary error of physics that caused the global warming scare Learn More »

The Hazards of Lending Books on Climate Change

Today my good friend Dr. Tom Sheahen, a physicist and head of the Institute for Theological Encounter with Science and Technology (ITEST), wrote to say, Already this morning a friend sent me the “Patriot Post” rendition of your article [“Senator Whitehouse, Your New Wardrobe Is Ready”] that quotes me at length. Thank you very much.

The Hazards of Lending Books on Climate Change Learn More »

Because Joe Bastardi Says It So Well

Joe Bastardi’s The Climate Chronicles: Inconvenient Revelations You Won’t Hear from Al Gore—And Others is simply a delightfully fun book to read. It’s also well reasoned. Here’s an example of clarity and cogency: … in the weaponization of weather, there are three factors that enable this tactic [of blaming all new weather extremes on anthropogenic global

Because Joe Bastardi Says It So Well Learn More »

Why You MUST Read Joe Bastardi’s The Climate Chronicles

The 38th through 41st chapters of the Book of Job are among the most majestic, awe-inspiring passages in all literature, inside and outside the Bible. I cannot read them and not feel small, humbled by the omnipresence, omnipotence, and omniscience of God. They record questions God hurls rapid-fire, “out of the whirlwind,” at Job to

Why You MUST Read Joe Bastardi’s The Climate Chronicles Learn More »

Nuclear Engineer Reveals “Climate Consensus” as Anti-Scientific

Over at the American Nuclear Society’s ANS Cafe blog, ANS Fellow and Adjunct Professor of Nuclear Engineering Dr. Ruth Weiner exposes the anti-scientific character of appealing to consensus to push climate alarmism: Scientific thought progresses as a result of skepticism about a consensus rather than by invocation of that consensus. The fallacy of the 97

Nuclear Engineer Reveals “Climate Consensus” as Anti-Scientific Learn More »