Rescuing Science from Itself: How to Restore Rationality to an Increasingly Irrational Endeavor

“You can give respectability to mythology if you couch your myth in sufficiently academic language.” —Dr. R.C. Sproul Who in twenty-first century America would say that “science … our one source of objective knowledge, is in deep trouble” because “much of [the] supposed knowledge” it brings us “is turning out to be contestable, unreliable, unusable, […]

Rescuing Science from Itself: How to Restore Rationality to an Increasingly Irrational Endeavor Learn More »

Statistician Matt Briggs Disembowels Climate Trend Presentations

Climate alarmists all over are having fun pushing the picture of historically unprecedented global warming in a recent cartoon timeline. It’s fun stuff, and granted the scientific and statistical illiteracy of most Americans (and others), it seems compelling. But then a real statistician who’s also a climate scientist steps in and spoils all the fun.

Statistician Matt Briggs Disembowels Climate Trend Presentations Learn More »

Whom to Trust? NASA GISS, NASA, or Cornwall Alliance?

After citing a couple of Cornwall Alliance’s articles in discussion, an educator friend got this response from one of his former students: The problem with referencing the Cornwall Alliance to discredit statistics from the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies is that one (the Cornwall Alliance) is a political advocacy organization with no scientific relevance while

Whom to Trust? NASA GISS, NASA, or Cornwall Alliance? Learn More »

Climate Models: Uncertain? Inaccurate? What’s the Difference? Why Does it Matter?

For years I have been pointing out that the super-sophisticated computer climate models on which the IPCC, national environment agencies, national academies of science, and of course the many climate-alarmist advocacy groups and journalists depend for their predictions of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) predict, on average, 2 to 3 times the warming actually observed

Climate Models: Uncertain? Inaccurate? What’s the Difference? Why Does it Matter? Learn More »

Sin, Deception, and the Corruption of Science: A Look at the So-Called Climate Crisis

Summary The climate crisis agenda provides an excellent training opportunity for Christians to “test all things, hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21) because it involves a revival of ancient pagan themes in science, the educational establishment, business, and politics. Sadly, it demonstrates how those themes are corrupting the scientific method that has contributed

Sin, Deception, and the Corruption of Science: A Look at the So-Called Climate Crisis Learn More »

Dangerous Global Warming—Now You See It, Now You Don’t

A picture can be worth a thousand words—especially if it’s deliberately designed to mislead and scare people, because of course so many think “seeing is believing.” That’s why CAGW alarmists are so eager to show us pictures like this of the annual global surface temperature anomaly from 1850 to 2015: That comes from the UK’s

Dangerous Global Warming—Now You See It, Now You Don’t Learn More »

Finding Nemo Suffocated?

One hardly knows where to begin in assessing the sanity of the recent claim that “climate change” (aka dangerous manmade global warming renamed to hide the fact that far less warming is happening than predicted) could suffocate—yes, suffocate!—sea creatures by reducing ocean oxygen levels. The scary story comes mainly from popular reports. Take, for example,

Finding Nemo Suffocated? Learn More »