An Assement of the Coventional Global Warming Narrative

Description

An Assessment of the Conventional Global Warming Narrative, is a concise, layman-friendly study that should free all its readers from fears of dangerous manmade global warming. In a clear, lively style, he points out, for instance, that the difference between daytime low and nighttime high in many locations runs anywhere from 10 to 70 times the difference between global average temperature 170 years ago and what’s predicted—in panic!—for the end of this century. If the former doesn’t cause disaster, does it really make sense to think the latter will?

His short, simple section “Where does CO2 fit in the climate?” demonstrates conclusively that global average temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration simply don’t correlate in a way that would support the theory that CO2 is Earth’s temperature control knob.

“CO2 is a particularly ridiculous choice for a ‘pollutant,’ he writes. “Its primary role is as a fertilizer for plant life. Currently, almost all plants are starved of CO2. Moreover, if we were to remove a bit more than 60% of current CO2, the consequences would b dire: nearly death by starvation for all animal life.”

Lindzen’s An Assessment of the Conventional Global Warming Narrative is the kind of thing you can put in the hands of any high school graduate with confidence that—if he’ll read it!—he’ll understand it.