Reexamining the Obama Era Endangerment Finding

By /

Reversing this faulty EPA finding will curtail climate alarmism and green energy grifting The supposed climate cataclysm consensus is disintegrating under growing pressure from reality. Green energy subsidies, regulations and mandates are crumbling. Greenpeace has been hit with a $667-million judgment for conspiracy, defamation, trespass, and fostering arson and property destruction. Last year’s “Buy a […]

Reexamining the Obama Era Endangerment Finding Learn More »

Hey, EPA, Why Not Regulate Water Vapor Emissions While You Are At It?

By /

Some Background I will admit that the legal profession mystifies me. Every time I say anything related to environmental law, one or more lawyers will correct me. But I suppose “turnabout is fair play”, since I will usually correct any lawyers about their details describing climate change science. Lawyers aren’t like us normal people. Their

Hey, EPA, Why Not Regulate Water Vapor Emissions While You Are At It? Learn More »

Reasons Why Regulating CO2 Emissions Needs to be Reconsidered

By /

March 7, the Washington Post reported the EPA Administrator is considering recommending to the White House that the EPA’s 2009 CO2 Endangerment Finding be rescinded. Let’s look at a few of the reasons why this might be a good thing to consider. The Science The science of human-caused climate change is much more uncertain that you have

Reasons Why Regulating CO2 Emissions Needs to be Reconsidered Learn More »

Does Government Really Need to Regulate Everything?

By /

In high school and college, I competed in debate tournaments across the state and country. I clearly remember many occasions when a debate team’s plan would include abolishing some government program. Inevitably, the opponents would ask, “What will you replace it with?” Only once did I hear any debater respond with, “Nothing at all. Government

Does Government Really Need to Regulate Everything? Learn More »

Time for the Clean Power Plan to Go, Endangerment Finding Should Be Next

By /

Even before the ink was dry on former President Barack Obama’s signature mandating the creation of Clean Power Plan (CPP) regulations, state governments and industry were rushing up the courthouse steps to challenge the plan and block its implementation. Despite the fact CPP is just two years old, it has already traveled a long and

Time for the Clean Power Plan to Go, Endangerment Finding Should Be Next Learn More »

Monckton Writes to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Clean Power Plan

By /

We’re delighted that our friend Viscount Christopher Monckton, one of the leading critics of climate alarmism, allowed us to publish this letter to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, with which we wholeheartedly agree. We encourage citizens to make their own opinions known to Administrator Pruitt. By the way, what comes out of the

Monckton Writes to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Clean Power Plan Learn More »

Yes, Virginia, the polar bears are alive and well. Just ask the Inuit.

By /

by William D. Balgord The following report should serve as the coup de gras for demolishing the lame arguments behind the EPA endangerment finding. That watershed policy action relied on a false assumption that the polar bear is, or soon would be, threatened with extinction as a result of rapid climate change (viz., thinning ice

Yes, Virginia, the polar bears are alive and well. Just ask the Inuit. Learn More »