Study Destroys Basis of EPA Climate Regulations—No Starvation Driven by Climate Change

By /

For two decades, the public has been bombarded with dire warnings of an impending climate-induced agricultural apocalypse. The claim is that a climate warmed excessively by the carbon dioxide emissions of human activity will ravage the food supply and plunge humanity into famine and chaos. For many reasons, none of this ever made sense. Now, […]

Study Destroys Basis of EPA Climate Regulations—No Starvation Driven by Climate Change Learn More »

What’s the ‘Most Important Figure You’ve Never Heard of’?

By /

Get ready. You’re about to meet “the most important figure you’ve never heard of.” SCC. No, not SEC—Securities and Exchange Commission. (And you sports fans thought that was Southeastern Conference!) SCC stands for “social cost of carbon.” Which should prompt you immediately to ask two questions: “What’s that?” and “What’s that?” Okay, that’s one question.

What’s the ‘Most Important Figure You’ve Never Heard of’? Learn More »

Beware EPA ‘Social Cost of Carbon’ Models

By /

“Wouldn’t it be nice if we could scientifically determine the cumulative costs or benefits that result over the next three hundred years from our choices in the present? It may be nice, but it is impossible. ” “Because [mainstream climate] models produced such wildly different results depending on the projections and assumptions baked in the

Beware EPA ‘Social Cost of Carbon’ Models Learn More »

Monckton Writes to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Clean Power Plan

By /

We’re delighted that our friend Viscount Christopher Monckton, one of the leading critics of climate alarmism, allowed us to publish this letter to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, with which we wholeheartedly agree. We encourage citizens to make their own opinions known to Administrator Pruitt. By the way, what comes out of the

Monckton Writes to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on Clean Power Plan Learn More »

Trump’s Decision to Downplay Climate Change Could Save $Billions

By /

Climate-change hysteria is the primary rationale for switching from abundant, affordable, reliable energy from fossil fuels to diffuse, expensive, unreliable “renewable energy from wind, solar, geothermal, biofuels, etc. It’s also a main driver of failure after failure, often wasting millions or even billions in taxpayer dollars. That’s one of many reasons to cheer this report from

Trump’s Decision to Downplay Climate Change Could Save $Billions Learn More »

“Social Cost of Carbon”—Going, Going, Gone?

By /

  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency forecasts the “social cost of carbon” (SCC) in the year 2020 to run anywhere from $13 to $137 per metric ton. That’s EPA’s measure of the harm each ton of “carbon” (really carbon dioxide, but who cares with our ill-educated public that doesn’t know the difference between an element

“Social Cost of Carbon”—Going, Going, Gone? Learn More »