Cornwall Alliance

For the Stewardship of Creation

  • Home
  • About
    • Listen To Our Podcast “Created to Reign!”
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • What Drives Us
    • Our History in Highlights
    • Cornwall Alliance Statement of Faith
  • Landmark Documents
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Media
    • Press Releases
  • Shop
    • Books
    • DVDs
  • Contact
    • Challenging “Net-Zero”: Conquering Poverty While Stewarding the Earth in the Age of Climate Change
    • Summer Essay Contest!
    • Request a Talk Show Guest
    • Request Opinion Columns
    • Q&A Form
    • Request A Speaker
  • Donate
  • Get Our Newest Book: Climate and Energy: The Case for Realism

A Call for Accurate Language about CO2 in the AGW Discussion

by E. Calvin Beisner

November 25, 2015

In an otherwise fine article at WattsUpwithThat.com, Ari Halperin writes:

For some time, the subject [of the residence time of anthropogenic carbon dioxide in the atmosphere] was surrounded by confusion, created by sloppy definitions and evasive statements in IPCC assessment reports. There was a mix-up between the residence time of a CO2 molecule in the atmosphere and the rate of change of the surplus CO2 concentration.  The residence time (~5 years) is of little interest, except as an indication of quick carbon turnaround. The true subject of interest is the rate of change of the surplus carbon concentration in the atmosphere.  Another issue was the link between CO2 concentration and temperature. On the geological timescale, the rise in CO2 concentration tends to follow the temperature rise, concurring with a hypothesis that the latter causes the former. Nevertheless, such an effect is not significant on the multi-decadal scale. CO2 concentration in the atmosphere grows mostly because of anthropogenic release of CO2 through fossil fuels combustion and land use changes.

What’s wrong with that paragraph? Nothing that isn’t wrong with a vast amount of writing by climate realists: the inadvertent embrace of the misleading language of climate alarmists. Halperin refers to “the residence time of a CO2 molecule in the atmosphere and the rate of change of the surplus CO2 concentration,” which is accurate language, but then he refers to “the rate of change of the surplus carbon concentration in the atmosphere,” which is inaccurate language—and it plays right into the hands of climate alarmists.

To gin up public panic, climate alarmists routinely call carbon dioxide “carbon.” Of course that’s simply horrendous chemistry. Carbon is an element, sixth on the Periodic Table. As fine particles of dust, we call it soot, and, inhaled sufficiently, it’s dangerous, causing upper respiratory diseases. Carbon dioxide is a molecule consisting of one atom of carbon and two atoms of oxygen. In the atmosphere, it is a gas—odorless, colorless, tasteless, and, except at very high concentrations (above ~30,000 ppmv, depending on length of exposure; the global atmospheric concentration now is ~400 ppmv, and human breath exhaled is typically ~40,000 ppmv) for long periods, nontoxic. It is essential to photosynthesis and animal respiration (its elevation in the bloodstream triggering autonomic exhalation), and the more of it there is in the atmosphere, the better plants grow, making more food for everybody.

So by calling carbon dioxide “carbon,” the alarmists fool people. They raise specters of black soot that’s truly dangerous to health. Then they speak of a “carbon tax,” or “carbon footprint,” or reducing “carbon emissions” or “carbon pollution,” and the unwary public duly salivates—despite the fact that all those photos of clouds of “smoke” billowing out of the “smokestacks” of power plants shown when climate alarmists warn about all the “carbon” spewing into the atmosphere actually show no carbon dioxide at all (because it’s invisible), but almost entirely condensing water vapor—which, like carbon dioxide, is quite welcome to plants.

So here’s a call for climate realists to eschew forever the shorthand “carbon” when we mean “carbon dioxide.” Whenever we quote the alarmists using the term that way, we should follow it with [sic; actually carbon dioxide, an odorless, colorless, nontoxic gas essential to plant photosynthesis and animal respiration] the first time, and [sic; actually carbon dioxide] every following time in the same article. I know, I know, that might seem pedantic. But we need to do this to drum out of the public’s mind (as the alarmists have drummed into it) the false equation of carbon and carbon dioxide, and drum into its mind (as they’ve drummed out of it) the true distinction between the two.

 

 

Featured image courtesy of thewritingzone, Creative Commons.

Dated: November 25, 2015

Tagged With: carbon, Carbon Dioxide, climate alarmists, climate brainwashing, climate propaganda, climate realists, language games
Filed Under: Bridging Humanity and the Environment, Politics & Law

About E. Calvin Beisner

Dr. Beisner is Founder and National Spokesman of The Cornwall Alliance; former Associate Professor of Historical Theology & Social Ethics, at Knox Theological Seminary, and of Interdisciplinary Studies, at Covenant College; and author of “Where Garden Meets Wilderness: Evangelical Entry into the Environmental Debate” and “Prospects for Growth: A Biblical View of Population, Resources, and the Future.”

Comments

  1. David Stahl says

    December 3, 2015 at 10:06 am

    In reading the open letter it maintained that climate change is overwhelmingly natural. But near the end it states that man made carbon dioxide emissions cause a slight global warming. Really?! Why does the letter state that? I thought the letter had just disputed that claim! Some articles state there hasn’t been global warming in the last 17 years. Obama says the warmest years ever were in the last 10 years. Will the truth please stand up?!

    Reply
    • E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D. says

      December 3, 2015 at 11:29 am

      It’s pretty simple really, David. “Overwhelmingly natural” doesn’t mean “exclusively natural,” and we, like almost all climate realists (sometimes called “climate skeptics”), recognize that carbon dioxide does almost certainly cause a slight warming of the atmosphere. So natural cycles—solar, ocean, Milankovich, etc.—cause most of the warming, and anthropogenic CO2 contributes a little more (probably about 1/6 to 1/2 as much as the IPCC has been claiming since 1990). Those two points are perfectly consistent.

      The period without warming, according to the RSS satellite data, now stretches to 18 years and 9 months, not just 17, and that’s perfectly consistent with Obama’s claim that 10 of the warmest years on record have been in this century (and variations on it). When one climbs to a plateau, one remains at that altitude until one either begins climbing again or begins descending.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Listen To Our Podcast


Available to listen on these platforms:

Spotify
Amazon Music
Apple Podcast
Google Podcast
Stitcher

Future Speaking Engagements

May 23, 2025 – Grand Rapids, MI

GR.Church, 4525 Stauffer Avenue Southeast, Grand Rapids, MI 49508

Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, Cornwall Alliance President, and Steve Goreham, Cornwall Alliance Board Member, will hold a symposium on Sustainable Energy, Climate Change, and the costs to YOUR life.  For tickets and more information, click HERE.

June 18-21, 2025–Dallas, TX

Cornwall Alliance will be a host of the Association of Classical Christian Schools’ (ACCS) annual Repairing the Ruins conference in Dallas, TX, and will have an exhibit booth.

Details and registration can be found HERE.

September 19-20–Arlington, VA

Dr Beisner will represent the Cornwall Alliance at the fall meeting of the Philadelphia Society and will have a literature table.

Attendance is for Society members and invited guests only. To inquire about an invitation, email Dr. Cal Beisner: Calvin@cornwallalliance.org.

September 26-27– Lynchburg, VA

Dr. Beisner will be speaking at the Christian Education Initiative Annual Summit, “Advancing Christ’s Kingdom Through Biblical Worldview Education.” 

Details and registration can be found HERE.

Are Science & Religion in Conflict?

Join Our Email List

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Recent Stewards Blog Posts

  • Traditional Media Turn Complex Science Into Impending Catastrophe
  • Why the Environmental Movement (Deep Ecology) and Socialism Are No Substitute for the Great Commission
  • Trump’s Example to the World: Cull Activists to Achieve Energy Abundance
  • Shapiro ‘Price Cap’ Could Hike Electricity Bills
  • Next Year, Let’s Have People Day, Not Earth Day

Top 40 Global Warming Blog by Feedspot

Search

Listen to Our Podcast

Available to listen on these platforms:

Spotify
Amazon Music
Apple Podcast
Google Podcast
Stitcher



Copyright © 2025 · Cornwall Alliance · 875 W. Poplar Avenue Suite 23-284, Collierville, TN 38017 · Phone: (423) 500-3009

Designed by Ingenious Geeks & John A. Peck · Log in