Cornwall Alliance

For the Stewardship of Creation

  • Home
  • About
    • Listen To Our Podcast “Created to Reign!”
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • What Drives Us
    • Our History in Highlights
    • Cornwall Alliance Statement of Faith
  • Landmark Documents
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Media
    • Press Releases
  • Shop
    • Books
    • DVDs
  • Contact
    • Challenging “Net-Zero”: Conquering Poverty While Stewarding the Earth in the Age of Climate Change
    • Summer Essay Contest!
    • Request a Talk Show Guest
    • Request Opinion Columns
    • Q&A Form
    • Request A Speaker
  • Donate
  • Get Our Newest Book: Climate and Energy: The Case for Realism

California’s Fish and Wildlife Commission Vs The Environment

by Stephen Vantassel

November 4, 2015

If I were to ask you, “In your opinion, what state in the continental U.S. best exemplifies a desire to care and preserve the environment on a sustainable level?” How would you answer? Note, I am not asking what state has the best environment as that could be simply a reflection of its population. It’s hard to have pollution when you have few people. Nor am I asking what state you would like to live in. I am asking what state works the hardest on protecting the environment from the perspective of sustainability.

Whatever state you mentioned, certainly California should be near the top of everyone’s list. They have some of the most rigorous pesticide use programs in the country. In addition, California is always banning some activity, product, or industry because of its negative environmental impacts.

In light of California’s purported love for the environment and sustainability, I find it ironic that the California Fish and Game Commission voted (3 to 2) to ban the trapping of bobcats in the state. Now understand, to trap bobcats in California, trappers must pass trapper training and an exam and then pay $115.00/year in license fees. Out of state trappers are dinged at $577.50/year. Harvested bobcats must be tagged before they can be sold. Tags cost $3.00 each. In addition, trappers must use cage or box traps as California banned the more efficient traps such as footholds and snares.

Now why would a state like California that purportedly loves the environment decide to ban the harvest of a renewable resource like bobcats, particularly since they could be captured only using cage and box traps? Well, it certainly wasn’t because bobcats were undergoing population declines. Between 2003 and 2013, the year with the most recent data, bobcat harvests ranged from 799 to 1,639. With the most recent pelt price (2013-2014 season) averaging $390, the total value of the harvest for 2013-2014 season comes out to $639,210. Certainly not a huge amount of money by California standards, but note that only 93 trappers accounted for those captures. So I suspect the value of those cats was very important to them.

So why did the Commission ban the harvest of this valuable renewable resource? Was safety an issue? Are trappers really a threat to public safety? No. Though traps set illegally as well as illegal traps can and have injured pets. Injuries to humans don’t appear to be an issue. It should also be noted that most injuries occur to pets that owners have let off the leash. It’s interesting that when cars kill pets, we don’t ban cars. But when a trap injures a pet, we ban traps.

So could the reason be that the cost of overseeing bobcat trapping exceeds the income derived by the Commission? Perhaps. According to documents, the revenue of bobcat trapping to the agency is about $30,000. But the agency claims the cost to oversee and enforce the program costs $161,000. Readers should keep in mind that California’s bobcat season only lasts 69 days.

What readers may not know is that several areas in California already prohibited bobcat trapping. With trapper numbers declining over the decades, coupled with loss of trapping areas, it should not be a surprise that the Commission is spending more than it is bringing in. To make matters worse, the animal rights protest industry groups made their usual arguments about how irresponsible trapping is. So one could wonder if the Commission voted to kill bobcat trapping and therefore kill two birds with one stone, namely save costs and get the animal rights protest industry groups off their back, at least for a little while.

The irony of this decision is that a state that claims to care about sustainability and the environment decides to ban one practice that derives income from a renewable resource. Trapping is one of the few ways to harvest wealth from the land that doesn’t impact the underlying habitat. Foresters can’t say that. Mining can’t say that (not that I am opposed to either of those activities). My point is, it is easy for a government to punish a small minority of people who practice a skill that, though environmentally sound, is unpopular because ignorant people think that harvesting wildlife is somehow evil. One need only read (heck you only need to scan it) Mr. Baylis’ views from the Center for Biological Diversity to see the underlying attitude that harvest of wildlife is evil (see pdf page 77).

Bottom line, urbanites (those that live in areas with more concrete and asphalt than wide open spaces) should be concerned about the loss of bobcat trapping in California. If people who perform tasks that are clearly sustainable and environmentally sound can’t keep their jobs, how does any job have a future? Losing the bobcat harvest stops revenue creation and it means that just a little more pressure is placed on the job market and public welfare services. The fact is America has abundant wildlife resources that are underutilized not because they aren’t valuable but because too many people think using wildlife materials is morally wrong. That my friend, is not a scientific view, that is a religious view and it is not a Christian one.

 

Featured Image Courtesy of Don DeBold/Flickr CC

Dated: November 4, 2015

Tagged With: Bobcats, California, California Fish and Game Commission, Hunting, Trappers
Filed Under: Bridging Humanity and the Environment, Environmental Subjects

About Stephen Vantassel

Stephen M. Vantassel is a tutor of theology at King’s Evangelical Divinity. He specializes in environmental ethics. His book, Dominion over Wildlife? An Environmental-Theology of Human-Wildlife Relations (Wipf and Stock, 2009) explains why an animal rights perspective on animals fails to be environmentally responsible.

Comments

  1. david hastings says

    November 9, 2015 at 10:41 am

    The comments are so very rational that Dr. Vantassel has made, and are an excellent summary of the issue. His writing is “spot on.”
    However, rationality may not be of much use in the case, as science and data were excluded or discounted in the decision making process. California’s decision was not a rational one, but rather one based on values and emotional gut reaction. Sadly, (and ironically) these kinds of positions ultimately cause more suffering to the ecosystems, not less.

    Dave Hastings
    Nebraska

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Listen To Our Podcast


Available to listen on these platforms:

Spotify
Amazon Music
Apple Podcast
Google Podcast
Stitcher

Future Speaking Engagements

June 18-21, 2025–Dallas, TX

Cornwall Alliance will be a host of the Association of Classical Christian Schools’ (ACCS) annual Repairing the Ruins conference in Dallas, TX, and will have an exhibit booth.

Details and registration can be found HERE.

September 19-20–Arlington, VA

Dr Beisner will represent the Cornwall Alliance at the fall meeting of the Philadelphia Society and will have a literature table.

Attendance is for Society members and invited guests only. To inquire about an invitation, email Dr. Cal Beisner: Calvin@cornwallalliance.org.

September 26-27– Lynchburg, VA

Dr. Beisner will be speaking at the Christian Education Initiative Annual Summit, “Advancing Christ’s Kingdom Through Biblical Worldview Education.” 

Details and registration can be found HERE.

Are Science & Religion in Conflict?

Join Our Email List

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Recent Stewards Blog Posts

  • GAO Questions Biden’s Offshore Wind Effort, Vindicates Critics
  • India Spurns Carbon Tax Threat, Promotes Trade and Fossil Fuels
  • Energy Heresy: Why America Must Exit the Green Delusion
  • Financials Shift from ‘Green’ Agenda to Greenbacks
  • What Really Drove Skyrocketing Egg Prices?

Top 40 Global Warming Blog by Feedspot

Search

Listen to Our Podcast

Available to listen on these platforms:

Spotify
Amazon Music
Apple Podcast
Google Podcast
Stitcher



Copyright © 2025 · Cornwall Alliance · 875 W. Poplar Avenue Suite 23-284, Collierville, TN 38017 · Phone: (423) 500-3009

Designed by Ingenious Geeks & John A. Peck · Log in