The Ice Is Melting! The Ice Is Melting! Run for Your Lives!

Chicken Little never takes a vacation when it comes to environmental scares. A spring without birds, overpopulation, mass famines, resource exhaustion, rainforest destruction, mass extinctions, global cooling, acid rain, ozone depletion, global warming … the list could go on and on. Just on the topic of global warming Chicken Little touts a new alarm pretty […]

The Ice Is Melting! The Ice Is Melting! Run for Your Lives! Learn More »

Freeman Dyson’s brief case against dangerous CO2-driven warming

At a lecture at Boston University a few years ago, Freeman Dyson, one of the world’s top physicists, who replaced Albert Einstein at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, put very simply one of the most basic arguments against the notion that CO2-driven global warming is likely to be disastrous: In humid air, the

Freeman Dyson’s brief case against dangerous CO2-driven warming Learn More »

Global Temperature and CO2—Which Drives Which?

The climate alarmist crowd never tires of insisting that anthropogenic additions to atmospheric carbon dioxide—up by 45 percent, from 280 to about 407 parts per million, since before the Industrial Revolution—are driving historically unprecedented and likely-to-become catastrophic global warming, and that they’re exacerbated by increases in atmospheric methane (CH4) driven by the rising temperature, making

Global Temperature and CO2—Which Drives Which? Learn More »

Heidegger, Fascism, Evergreen State College, and the Environmental Movement

There’s a lot more behind modern environmentalism than enjoyment of furry animals and beautiful landscapes. Existentialism and Postmodernism have made significant contributions, and they, in turn, have their own deep roots. Rev. Mark Musser, an expert on German Romanticism, Idealism, and Existentialism, has written at length in his book Nazi Oaks: The Green Sacrifice of

Heidegger, Fascism, Evergreen State College, and the Environmental Movement Learn More »

Solar: The Little Engine that Couldn’t

There are lots of dirty little secrets (though they’re increasingly widely known!) about wind and solar power, the two darlings of “Green energy” lovers: high cost for low output, intermittency, production far below nameplate capacity, heavy dependence on subsidies, tendency for installations to lose efficient productive capacity long before they pay for themselves, chopped or

Solar: The Little Engine that Couldn’t Learn More »

Chasing Climate Change Politics At The EPA

Pulling out of the faulty Paris climate accord, which was steeped in political and scientific gyrations, was necessary for the U.S. Meanwhile, at the nation’s capital, former and current top level Environmental Protection Agency officials are stressed out about politics influencing scientific practice at the EPA. In Washington, D.C. earlier in May, at a conference

Chasing Climate Change Politics At The EPA Learn More »

A Global Warming Red Team Warning: Do NOT Strive for Consensus with the Blue Team

Now that the idea of a global warming Red Team approach to help determine what our energy policy should be is gaining traction, it is important that we understand what that means to some of us who have been advocating it for over 10 years — and also what it doesn’t mean. The Red Team

A Global Warming Red Team Warning: Do NOT Strive for Consensus with the Blue Team Learn More »

Do America’s Science Teachers and Students Need a Ministry of Truth?

Four liberal Democratic Senators—Sheldon Whitehouse (RI), Elizabeth Warren (MA), Brian Schatz (HI), and Edward Markey (MA)—are upset because Education Secretary Betsy DeVos called President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement an “example of his commitment to rolling back the unrealistic and overreaching regulatory actions by the previous Administration.” Thank heavens! These

Do America’s Science Teachers and Students Need a Ministry of Truth? Learn More »

What’s Wrong with the Claim that “97% of Climate Scientists Agree” about Global Warming?

A variety of studies have purported to find an overwhelming consensus among climate scientists on global warming. However, the studies rarely specify what it is to which the scientists agree. Usually it is nothing more than that the earth has warmed since 1800 and that human activity has contributed significantly to the warming—something almost no

What’s Wrong with the Claim that “97% of Climate Scientists Agree” about Global Warming? Learn More »