How Do Hard Data and Computer Climate Models’ Dire Predictions Compare?

Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman explained “the key to science” this way: In general we look for a new law by the following process. First we guess it. Then we compute the consequences of the guess to see what would be implied if this law that we guessed is right. Then we compare the result

How Do Hard Data and Computer Climate Models’ Dire Predictions Compare? Learn More »

Endless Winter in the Era of Climate Crusade: A Wakeup Call

On every Earth Day coming, attention around the world turns to environmental issues. None is more famous — or infamous — than climate change. The winter of 2017–2018 has stirred debate about global warming. Some say the long, cold winter should quell climate alarmism. Others use it as evidence for extreme manmade warming. Who’s right? An Inconvenient Winter

Endless Winter in the Era of Climate Crusade: A Wakeup Call Learn More »

After 20 Years, No New Global Temperature Record

[The article below by Cornwall Alliance Senior Fellow Dr. Roy W. Spencer, reprinted from his blog by permission, reports that the linear warming trend from 1970–2017 was 0.13 deg. C per decade. The computer climate models on which the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the negotiators

After 20 Years, No New Global Temperature Record Learn More »

Why Are Older Scientists More Likely to Doubt Climate Alarmism?

Back in 1984, Richard Lamm, then Democratic Governor of Colorado, gained infamy for having said the terminally ill elderly have “a duty to die and get out of the way.” Such disrespect for age persists among Progressives. Bill Nye “the Science Guy,” a major proponent of global warming alarmism, blames climate skepticism on age. “Climate

Why Are Older Scientists More Likely to Doubt Climate Alarmism? Learn More »

Judith Curry confirms: climate models can’t justify policy—ANY policy

For years we at the Cornwall Alliance have been saying that the disagreement between model predictions (or projections or simulations, call them what you will) of global temperatures and real-world observations means the models are invalidated and therefore provide no rational basis for predictions of future temperature and therefore no rational basis for policies meant

Judith Curry confirms: climate models can’t justify policy—ANY policy Learn More »

Climate Models: Uncertain? Inaccurate? What’s the Difference? Why Does it Matter?

For years I have been pointing out that the super-sophisticated computer climate models on which the IPCC, national environment agencies, national academies of science, and of course the many climate-alarmist advocacy groups and journalists depend for their predictions of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) predict, on average, 2 to 3 times the warming actually observed

Climate Models: Uncertain? Inaccurate? What’s the Difference? Why Does it Matter? Learn More »

How Theology Can, and Should, Contribute to Scientific and Public Discourse about Anthropogenic Global Warming

  A paper presented to the Round Table on Theology, Climate Change, and Politics, University of Western Ontario, May 29, 2012 Paleoanthropologist and philosopher Loren Eiseley (1907–1977), who though religious in the tradition of American Transcendentalists Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau was certainly no orthodox Christian theist, on reflecting on the kind of soil

How Theology Can, and Should, Contribute to Scientific and Public Discourse about Anthropogenic Global Warming Learn More »