Taking Politics Out of Climate Science

Protesters at the “March for Science,” Earth Day, April 22, 2017. (Photo by Tom Hilton, Flickr CC.)

[Excerpted from the Washington Times]

A red team, blue team match would test the assumptions of man-made global warming.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator Scott Pruitt wants to adopt a red team, blue team approach to weighing the scientific pros and cons about man-made global warming.

According to E&E News reporter Emily Holden, “Climate scientists express concern that the ‘red team, blue team’ concept could politicize scientific research” related to global warming.

To paraphrase Captain Louis Renault in Casablanca, I’m shocked, shocked to find that politics is going on in climate science. Say it isn’t so that a former senator and vice president was behind the Oscar-winning “An Inconvenient Truth” and now “An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power.”

That he and another senator arranged for NASA scientist James Hansen to give his famous testimony — that he was 99 percent certain that human activity was causing unprecedented warming — in a committee room with the air conditioning shut off and windows opened on a hot summer day in 1988.

That a current senator wants corporations, think tanks and scientists who dare question climate orthodoxy prosecuted civilly or criminally under federal racketeering laws.

And that a now-former president tweeted “Climate change is real — #ScienceSaysSo. Call out #climate deniers on Twitter.”

But it is so.  …

[Click here to read the rest of this article in the Washington Times explaining why a red team, blue team approach to science issues in government agencies would help to improve the quality of government science while depoliticizing it.]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *