Proponents of climate alarmism have long claimed that developing countries like India will be the worst affected by climate change. Their claims cannot be farther from reality.
With a population of 1.3 billion people and millions emigrating out of the country every year, India’s contribution to the global economy is significant.
Traditionally agrarian, India has become increasingly dependent on its growing industrial sector. The country’s energy sector serves as the backbone of its industries, and it derives 72 percent (2014) of its electricity from coal plants.
That shouldn’t be a surprise, given India’s abundant coal reserves, which guarantee inexpensive and affordable electricity to a nation where poverty is still rampant. The country is also keen on building new nuclear and hydroelectric plants.
In recent years, however, India has been heckled by the United Nations and other global institutions to reduce its dependence on coal and install more expensive—and unreliable—wind and solar energy sources.
The reason? Climate alarmism!
Climate alarmists have long stated that carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) from human activity, like burning coal for energy, is the main reason for what they say is a “dangerous” increase in global temperature (perhaps as much as 1.2˚C since 1850).
Yes, the earth’s climate system does change constantly. But climate alarmists have institutionalized a hypothesis to make countries accept the imaginary collapse of the planet’s climate system.
It is true that carbon dioxide emissions have dramatically increased in the past three decades. But the temperature levels have barely risen along with them, and the two show no coherence.
In fact, evidence suggests that there has been no significant increase in temperatures during the past two decades. This sobering reality was even acknowledged by leading climate alarmists. Yet the alarmist narrative continues in the mainstream media.
It has also been proved that the alarmist temperature projections generated by computer climate models have been way off the mark, failing to reflect real-world temperatures. The models failed miserably to capture the changes in the temperature during the past 20 years.
In India, climate alarmists predicted an agricultural nightmare resulting from CO2-induced climate change. However, a closer inspection reveals something very different.
North and central India have had better rainfall in the past five decades than the early 20th century. Record highs in Indian cities exhibit no significant increase in the past two decades. This does not bode well for the alarmist narrative, which claims that temperatures are on a linear upward trend.
The southern city of Chennai, for example, recorded its highest temperature in 2003. The imaginary trends of alarmists are nowhere to be seen.
The country had numerous record highs in the year of 2016 due to the super-El Niño phenomenon (warming of the tropical Pacific, which in turn warms the air that circulates globally), which pushed temperature upwards. Since then, temperatures have largely remained close to the historical averages.
The everyday lows during the early months of 2018 in southern India show no marked increase from their historical average. If anything, they have been below average at some places.
And as we speak, tropical sea temperatures have registered a record drop, contradicting the alarmist narrative of increasing ocean temperatures, leading into a La Niña that will likely draw global temperature back down.
And it is not just India’s weather phenomena that contradict the warming mantra. Its agricultural sector has produced record crop output in the last two years—dealing a lethal blow to the alarmist narrative of agricultural collapse.
India should not be forced to abandon its coal when its agricultural sector is actually benefitting from the climatic conditions and there has been no warming-induced increase in extreme weather events.
India’s industrial sector provides the right balance for a country that was traditionally agrarian. Policies advocated by climate alarmists put both the agricultural and the industrial sectors in danger.
By branding coal the evil cancer of the society, alarmists are coercing India to abandon its most abundant, reliable, inexpensive, and easily accessible energy source—coal.
Developing countries like India should reject the climate alarmists’ pseudo-scientific propaganda and rely instead on empirical evidence to safeguard their national interests.
Article originally published on RouserNews.com.
Featured Photo by Alan Mizell on Unsplash.
John Shanahan says
Vijay in India and other talented and well informed young people like him in Africa are making their voices heard about what really should be happening to improve their countries, instead of self-serving privileged people in the North America and Europe dictating foolish – no fossil fuel energy plans to the world.
Congratulations, Vijay.
Vijay Raj Jayaraj says
Thank you John for your encouraging words. Yes, I see great trouble in future if developing countries make a mandatory transition to renewables. We have no obligation whatsoever to bow to the international pressures from the elite alarmists.
Thanks, Vijay
Harold H Doiron, PhD says
What India decides to do about its CO2 emissions will have much greater impact on global atmospheric CO2 concentration of the future than anything the USA will do.
If you lived in a developing country like India, how would you feel about the UN and more developed nations telling you that you needed to abandon inexpensive coal that is responsible for lifting you out of poverty and that you should be investing your limited resources into more expensive and intermittent wind and solar power generation to save the planet? I believe President Trump’s brave leadership on this issue by pulling the USA out of the UN Paris Agreement, while taking a constant barrage of heat from credibility-crumbling European leaders, will be very much appreciated by developing countries.
How convincing would climate alarmists need to be for you, as a citizen of India, to encourage your leaders to follow the UN’s agenda? The facts in this article about India’s recent weather/climate trends and agricultural production trends wouldn’t go very far in encouraging India’s leaders to do much about the UN’s desire to control global CO2 emissions.
Vijay Raj Jayaraj says
Hello Harold,
India appears to be sticking with coal for now. There is no indication that the country is going to reduce its coal production for domestic consumption and export.
Yes, the Indian leadership is extremely pleased that Trump is Pro-coal. If we can recall, India was a key player in the whole ‘Climate Justice’ episode. India have found a great new ally in USA for their negotiations at the international climate table. Both India and China will be happy, because the focus will not be diverted a little away from them. But they are playing the perfect game of acting like renewable wannabes, while consuming more and more coal.
For climate alarmists to really persuade India, they have to just wait for the country to alleviate poverty. So the answer is – not anytime soon. We have plenty of issues that are totally broke. There is no way we can fully adopt renewables without a draconian dictator style mandatory hike in electricity prices by the government. But the industries won’t be quiet and the economy will take a hit when the renewable scandal hits the energy sector in a bigger way.
UN’s desires are very well known to Indian leaders like Modi. In fact, Modi appears to talk climate alarmism in international meetings, yet appears to take a dig at alarmism in his more informal meetings at domestic level. In fact, I met a minister in Government who told us that the Indian Government categorically classifies CO2 as a NON-pollutant. He encouraged industries to address local environmental concerns, than being obsessed with CO2.
Indian industry too, has moved away from CO2 reduction. Now its all about Renewables installation. No one cares why they are doing it. Its all money.