Cornwall Alliance

For the Stewardship of Creation

  • Home
  • About
    • Listen To Our Podcast “Created to Reign!”
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • What Drives Us
    • Our History in Highlights
    • Cornwall Alliance Statement of Faith
  • Landmark Documents
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Media
    • Press Releases
  • Shop
    • Books
    • DVDs
  • Contact
    • Challenging “Net-Zero”: Conquering Poverty While Stewarding the Earth in the Age of Climate Change
    • Summer Essay Contest!
    • Request a Talk Show Guest
    • Request Opinion Columns
    • Q&A Form
    • Request A Speaker
  • Donate
  • Get Our Newest Book: Climate and Energy: The Case for Realism

Was July the “Hottest Month on Record”? Who Cares?

by E. Calvin Beisner

August 26, 2016

A photo by Tony Reid. unsplash.com/photos/UMJUr3st0AE

Mainstream media the world over breathlessly report that scientists say July 2016 was the “hottest” month in the global temperature record stretching back to 1880 (or as CNN wrongly reported, “ever”)! And future Julys will only become hotter! Repent, the end is near!

Or maybe not. Consider:

First, for most of the world, whether land or sea, raw data were nonexistent for most of the period before, roughly speaking, the 1960s, making precise claims about global temperature before then tenuous.

Second, from then until 1979, when satellite measurements became available, for most of the world, land or sea, raw data were not geographically randomly distributed and therefore not statistically representative, making the claims still more tenuous.

Third, NOAA and NASA have been busily “homogenizing” raw data over the last few years, the rather suspicious result of which is an almost universal lowering of older readings and raising of later readings, augmenting the apparent rise in temperature. That homogenizing has resulted, for instance, in masking the fact that the raw data show that in the continental U.S. the 1930s were significantly warmer and had far more record high temperatures than the present (and data for most of the rest of the world are far less comprehensive and accurate than the [still not very comprehensive and accurate] data for the U.S.).

Fourth, according to the satellite data—our most comprehensive and least subject to contamination—the claim is false.

The claim is that July was the “hottest month”—not just the hottest July—on record, going all the way back to 1880. That’s much more expansive and therefore much easier to refute than the claim that it’s the hottest July since 1979, so if the latter’s false, the former must be, too.

Here are the July temperature anomalies (departures in ˚C from the 1981–2010 average) according to the UAH satellite data for the period:

So July 2016 isn’t even the warmest July on record, even stretching back only to 1979. The record month was July 1998—in a year made abnormally warm by the same thing that’s making 2016 abnormally warm, an abnormally strong El Niño.

All those caveats aside, I have no objection to granting the claim that July 2016 was the warmest July, or even the warmest month, since records began in the 1880s, but that’s really not significant. Why?

  1. In the early 1800s the world started rising out of the Little Ice Age, and when one climbs for a while and reaches a plateau, it’s mathematically certain that one’s altitude (or in this case temperature) will remain at or around that plateau until one either resumes ascending or begins descending, so record highs are no big surprise.
  2. The margin by which July 2016 is warmer (a more realistic term than “hotter”) than the near runners-up is so tiny as to be utterly without impact on human or other life on earth.
  3. The entire spread between the “hottest” and “coldest” Julys in the satellite record is 1.2˚C, and I dare you to find someone who will step from a room at 15˚C (59˚F) to a room at 16.1˚C (60.98˚F) and, unrehearsed, say “Ugh, this room is hotter!” (as distinct from mildly warmer). So much of this controversy is rooted in overblown rhetoric!
  4. And the difference between July 2016 (0.39˚C) and the next- (meaning third-) hottest July (2010) is only 0.06˚C. That’s indiscernible to humans and, for that matter, not really measurable—though calculable, but well under the measurement margin of error—for the globe as a whole.

Ah, but scientists say future Julys will only become hotter!

So what? Either they have a crystal ball, or they claim divine inspiration (which might be a little difficult for the atheists among them), or they’re talking through their hats.

Nobody knows what future temperatures will be. Even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in its Third Assessment Report, “The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible” (emphasis added).

“Future Julys will only become hotter”? That means the ups and downs evidenced in the 37-year satellite record will stop. How likely do you think that is? It means we’ll get only ups—every single year, on into the indefinite future. There will be no more “little ice ages” driven by solar minima, or glacial periods driven by Milankovich cycles, or any other such thing. How likely do you think that is?

We’re not done yet. How does July’s temperature anomaly (Can you imagine how much less alarming these announcements would be if couched in such language?) fit into the broader history of global temperature?

It depends on how far back you want to go. For the satellite record, you’ve got the entire record for Julys above, and you can see for yourself: it’s hardly significant. For the land and sea surface temperature record back to 1880, sure, maybe it’s warmer, by perhaps 1˚C, than at the start of the period (not than the next-warmest month), but so what? Temperature changes by ten or twenty times that from low to high on any given day in many locales around the world, and by sixty to eighty times that from winter low to summer high.

Since the end of the last glacial period (~18,000 years ago), it’s much warmer than at the start (thank God!), but much cooler than the Holocene Climate Optimum (~9,000–5,000 year ago) and probably cooler than the Minoan (~3,000 years ago) and Roman (~2,000 years ago) warm periods and almost certainly cooler than the Medieval Warm Period (~950–1250 a.d.).

Finally, in the debate over the magnitude of the human contribution to global warming, this is utterly irrelevant. A 0.06˚C difference is a 0.06˚C difference whether caused by turning on an electric stove burner a half second ago or natural solar and ocean cycles over thousands or millions of years or adding CO2 to the atmosphere for the last two centuries.

To argue, “If doubling atmospheric CO2 concentration raises global average temperature by x˚C over 100 years then July 2016 should be 0.06˚C warmer than July 2010; July 2016 is 0.06˚C warmer than July 2010; therefore doubling atmospheric CO2 concentration raises global average temperature by x˚C over 100 years” is to commit the fallacy of affirming the consequent (if x, then y; y; therefore x). That’s a fallacy because there could be other causes of y than x. And in this case we know for sure from long-term temperature history that there are plenty of causes for y (global warming) other than x (rising atmospheric CO2 concentration).

So cool it, folks. Don’t get sucked in by the rhetorical hype. Enjoy a mint julep, hug your kids, and get on with life, remembering God’s promise: “While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease” (Genesis 8:22).

An abridged version of this was previously published in The Washington Times.

Dated: August 26, 2016

Tagged With: CO2, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Mainstream media, NASA, NOAA, Satellite data
Filed Under: Bridging Humanity and the Environment, Climate & Energy, Climate Policy

About E. Calvin Beisner

Dr. Beisner is Founder and National Spokesman of The Cornwall Alliance; former Associate Professor of Historical Theology & Social Ethics, at Knox Theological Seminary, and of Interdisciplinary Studies, at Covenant College; and author of “Where Garden Meets Wilderness: Evangelical Entry into the Environmental Debate” and “Prospects for Growth: A Biblical View of Population, Resources, and the Future.”

Comments

  1. James says

    November 25, 2016 at 7:30 am

    You should post newer information from the IPCC reports, or include a timeline. The third assessment report is from 2001. It does show that they are not right, but people will probably not believe it is still relevant from 15 years ago

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Listen To Our Podcast


Available to listen on these platforms:

Spotify
Amazon Music
Apple Podcast
Google Podcast
Stitcher

Future Speaking Engagements

May 23, 2025 – Grand Rapids, MI

GR.Church, 4525 Stauffer Avenue Southeast, Grand Rapids, MI 49508

Dr. E. Calvin Beisner, Cornwall Alliance President, and Steve Goreham, Cornwall Alliance Board Member, will hold a symposium on Sustainable Energy, Climate Change, and the costs to YOUR life.  For tickets and more information, click HERE.

June 18-21, 2025–Dallas, TX

Cornwall Alliance will be a host of the Association of Classical Christian Schools’ (ACCS) annual Repairing the Ruins conference in Dallas, TX, and will have an exhibit booth.

Details and registration can be found HERE.

September 19-20–Arlington, VA

Dr Beisner will represent the Cornwall Alliance at the fall meeting of the Philadelphia Society and will have a literature table.

Attendance is for Society members and invited guests only. To inquire about an invitation, email Dr. Cal Beisner: Calvin@cornwallalliance.org.

September 26-27– Lynchburg, VA

Dr. Beisner will be speaking at the Christian Education Initiative Annual Summit, “Advancing Christ’s Kingdom Through Biblical Worldview Education.” 

Details and registration can be found HERE.

Are Science & Religion in Conflict?

Join Our Email List

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Recent Stewards Blog Posts

  • Traditional Media Turn Complex Science Into Impending Catastrophe
  • Why the Environmental Movement (Deep Ecology) and Socialism Are No Substitute for the Great Commission
  • Trump’s Example to the World: Cull Activists to Achieve Energy Abundance
  • Shapiro ‘Price Cap’ Could Hike Electricity Bills
  • Next Year, Let’s Have People Day, Not Earth Day

Top 40 Global Warming Blog by Feedspot

Search

Listen to Our Podcast

Available to listen on these platforms:

Spotify
Amazon Music
Apple Podcast
Google Podcast
Stitcher



Copyright © 2025 · Cornwall Alliance · 875 W. Poplar Avenue Suite 23-284, Collierville, TN 38017 · Phone: (423) 500-3009

Designed by Ingenious Geeks & John A. Peck · Log in