The News that Didn’t Fit—What I Told a New York Times “Reporter,” and He Didn’t Report

On June 16, 2015, I received an email from New York Times “reporter” Justin Gillis, who has written much highly critical of those who are skeptical of claims of catastrophic, anthropogenic global warming—people like me. Because I had taken the lead in producing An Open Letter to Pope Francis on Climate Change, Gillis posed some questions […]

The News that Didn’t Fit—What I Told a New York Times “Reporter,” and He Didn’t Report Learn More »

Extra! Extra! Missing AGW Intensifies California Drought!

The Old Gray Lady‘s (aka New York Times) perennial climate alarmist reporter Justin Gillis eagerly reported a new paper, “Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012-2014,” published in Geophysical Research Letters, claiming that anthropogenic global warming (AGW) might have intensified the current California drought by 15 to 20 percent. Alas, nasty facts get in the way,

Extra! Extra! Missing AGW Intensifies California Drought! Learn More »

Is John Cook, 97% Consensus Author, an Identity Thief?

As “everybody knows”—hey, even President Obama lectured us on the fact!—97% of all scientists agree: global warming is real and dangerous, and we must take drastic steps to stop it. The “researcher” behind that claim is University of Western Australia psychology postgraduate John Cook, whose “study”  has been torn to shreds for bad data handling,

Is John Cook, 97% Consensus Author, an Identity Thief? Learn More »

Global Warming: A Priority for the Rich and Free

Folks like those who stage events like the “Walk Against Warming” illustrated above think fighting climate change is a high priority. President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry say climate change is the greatest threat facing the world. But United Nations-sponsored worldwide polling suggests that how people answer the question, “How high a priority is

Global Warming: A Priority for the Rich and Free Learn More »

Anglican Bishop and Labour Leader Respond to Pope Francis on Climate Change

Anglican Bishop Peter Forster and Labour Party Leader Bernard Donoughue team up for a clear, concise, respectful, yet telling critique of Pope Francis’s encyclical LAUDATO SI’, published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation. They argue, as has the Cornwall Alliance, that: 1. The policies Pope Francis supports to reduce global warming will harm the world’s poor.

Anglican Bishop and Labour Leader Respond to Pope Francis on Climate Change Learn More »

Bringing a Little Sanity to the Environmental Protection Agency

Scientist and economist Dr. Alan Carlin was a model civil servant for nearly forty years, serving as a science analyst in the federal Environmental Protection Agency. But in 2009, he made a bad career move. He told the truth. As one of the EPA staff members assigned to assess the warming effect of added CO2

Bringing a Little Sanity to the Environmental Protection Agency Learn More »

“Global warming really has become a new religion”–Nobel Physicist Ivar Giaever

Ivar Giaever explains in this video lecture why he rejects global warming alarming. “It’s ridiculous,” he says, to think we can measure global average temperature (GAT) accurately, and that we should consider an increase in GAT from ~1880 to 2015 from ~288 degrees Kelvin to ~288.8 degrees Kelvin (an increase of only 0.3%) frightening. There’s

“Global warming really has become a new religion”–Nobel Physicist Ivar Giaever Learn More »

Is There a “Balance of Nature”?

Environmentalists, including the advisors responsible for the content of Pope Francis’s encyclical Laudato Si’, and even many of their critics, routinely refer to a “balance of nature,” a concept that elicits visions of fragile nature knocked off balance by crossing “tipping points” that lead to catastrophes–concepts fundamental to global warming alarmism. Veteran ecologist Daniel Botkin finds

Is There a “Balance of Nature”? Learn More »